BMAMS: Using drawdown & returns to analyse a system


This post was originally published on Trademakers

courtesy of trademakers

Last week we looked at the drawdown statistic, which effectively tells us the risk a system takes when trading. Here we will combine this risk statistic with the return on investment statistic which will provide us with a method of comparison between different systems.

A system that returns 40% in a year is better than a system that returns 20% in a year- right? Well maybe not. Returns alone do not provide a complete picture of the performance. What is the risk that each system took to achieve these results? This is why combining the return with the drawdown risk offers a better comparison between systems.


Say we have the above returns with these corresponding drawdowns:


System X – 40% return – 20% drawdown
System Y – 20% return – 5% drawdown


System X has 2 times the return to drawdown, but system Y has 4 times the return to drawdown.


System Y would be considered using this metric to be a better performing system. Why? Because by including drawdown we have normalised the relative performance between systems.


System X – 40%/20% = 2.0
System Y – 20%/5% = 4.0


So given the same risk – system Y is producing twice the returns as system X. Let’s say that we normalised each system to give 10% maximum drawdown risk to demonstrate in an alternative way.


System X – 20% risk converted to 10% risk = 0.5 multiple.
0.5 multiple of 40% return = 20% return. So at 10% risk
System X – 20% return at 10% drawdown.


System Y – 5% risk converted to 10% risk = 2.0 multiple.
2.0 multiple of 20% return = 40% return. So at 10% risk
System Y – 40% return at 10% drawdown.


To summarise the above conversion:

System X raw = 40% return 20% drawdown
System X relative = 20% return 10% drawdown

System Y raw = 20% return 5% drawdown
System Y relative = 40% return 10% drawdown


This demonstrates why considering not just the return- but the risk required to achieve those returns is vital in determining the quality of a system.

If only returns were used in our example, system X would be viewed as twice as ‘good’ as system Y.


However, once risk is evened out to be the same on each system, system Y is actually twice as good as system X.


The complete opposite conclusion is reached once risk is included in the comparative analysis.

Originally posted on

The post BMAMS: Using drawdown & returns to analyse a system first appeared on trademakers.

Connect with SGT Markets

Follow us for the latest news & insights

Related Articles


Central Banks Back in Focus


US Dollar Remains in Control


Mixed Data and Mixed Signals


Jackson Hole Weekend


US Dollar continues to rise along with China woes


US Dollar and Yields Rally


Central Banks Nearing Inflection Point?


BCIF and SGT Markets Partner to Offer Unique Blue-Chip Crypto Investment Strategy


Fed and ECB Meet Expectations


Inflation Slowing and Fed on The Horizon


USD Weakness as Demand for Dollars Slow


Further Rate Rises on The Horizon